1) The behaviors mentioned can be classified as follows:
a. Working in a clinic that performs abortions:
This behavior can be considered ethical but illegal in certain jurisdictions or societies where abortion is illegal. However, from an ethical perspective, it depends on one’s personal beliefs and values. Some individuals may view abortion as a woman’s right to reproductive autonomy and therefore consider working in such a clinic as both legal and ethical. Others may have moral or religious objections to abortion and consider it unethical regardless of its legality.
b. Respecting the wishes of a client suffering from ALS that he be permitted to die with dignity and not placed on “breathing machines”:
This behavior can be considered legal but unethical in jurisdictions where there are laws prohibiting euthanasia or assisted suicide. However, from an ethical perspective, it is a matter of respecting autonomy and the right to die with dignity. Some ethical theories, such as deontological theories, may prioritize respect for individual autonomy and therefore view this behavior as ethical even if it is illegal.
c. Respecting the health surrogate’s wishes regarding termination of life support of her friend:
This behavior can be considered legal and ethical if the health surrogate has the legal authority to make decisions on behalf of the patient and if the patient’s wishes have been clearly documented. However, if there are doubts about the validity of the surrogate’s authority or if the patient’s wishes are unknown, the behavior may be considered illegal or unethical.
d. Observing a coworker take out two tablets of oxycodone as ordered for pain management for his patient but keeping one for himself, administering only one tablet to the patient:
This behavior is both illegal and unethical. It involves theft of medication and potentially jeopardizes the patient’s well-being by withholding the prescribed dosage. This behavior violates legal and ethical principles related to patient safety, integrity, and professional conduct.
2) Deontological theories, utilitarianism, and principlism are ethical frameworks that guide decision-making and moral reasoning in different ways:
Deontological theories focus on duties and obligations. They emphasize moral rules or principles that should guide actions regardless of the consequences. For example, in healthcare, the principle of beneficence may require healthcare professionals to prioritize the well-being and best interests of their patients, even if the consequences may not be favorable for all parties involved. Deontological theories typically prioritize principles such as autonomy, justice, and non-maleficence.
Utilitarianism, on the other hand, evaluates actions based on their consequences and seeks to maximize overall happiness or utility for the greatest number of people. It emphasizes the idea of the greatest good for the greatest number. In healthcare, utilitarianism may involve making decisions that benefit the majority of patients, even if it means sacrificing the interests or well-being of a few individuals.
Principlism is an approach that combines elements of both deontological and consequentialist theories. It identifies a set of ethical principles that are relevant to healthcare, such as respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Principlism recognizes that these principles may sometimes conflict with each other and requires balancing them in a rational and systematic manner. It emphasizes the importance of context and case-by-case analysis in ethical decision-making.
3) Disclosing information about a poor prognosis to clients can be a challenging ethical issue in healthcare. On one hand, healthcare professionals have an ethical duty to provide honest and accurate information to their clients. This enables clients to make informed decisions about their care, understand the potential risks and benefits, and engage in shared decision-making.
On the other hand, disclosing such information may cause severe distress to clients, leading to psychological and emotional harm. It is important for healthcare professionals to consider the emotional well-being and autonomy of the client when disclosing information. In some cases, disclosing information in a compassionate and supportive manner, with appropriate psychological and emotional support, may help clients cope with the distress.
Overall, the disclosure of poor prognosis information should be guided by ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. It is important for healthcare professionals to engage in open and honest communication, while also considering the individual needs and preferences of each client.
4) Disclosing information to clients against family wishes can be a complex ethical dilemma. On one hand, healthcare professionals have a duty to respect patient autonomy and confidentiality. Clients have the right to receive information about their own health conditions and make decisions based on that information, even if it conflicts with the wishes of their family members.
On the other hand, family members often play a significant role in the care and support of the client, and their involvement can be crucial for the client’s well-being. In some cases, withholding information from family members may cause distrust, strain relationships, and hinder effective care and support.
The ethical decision regarding disclosure of information against family wishes should be guided by a careful consideration of the ethical principles involved, such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Healthcare professionals should engage in open and honest communication and work towards finding a balance between respecting patient autonomy and maintaining positive relationships with family members.
5) If you observe a colleague using another nurse’s password to access the medication administration system and take out a narcotic, it is important to address the situation promptly and appropriately. This behavior is both unethical and illegal, as it involves unauthorized access to medication and potential theft.
Firstly, it is recommended to report the incident to a supervisor or appropriate authority within the healthcare facility. They can initiate a proper investigation into the matter and take appropriate disciplinary actions if necessary. It is important to provide accurate and detailed information regarding the incident while maintaining confidentiality and protecting all parties involved.
Additionally, it may be appropriate to confront the colleague directly, expressing your concerns about their actions and explaining the ethical and legal implications. This may serve as an opportunity for the colleague to reflect on their behavior and take necessary steps to rectify it.
Overall, it is crucial to prioritize patient safety, uphold professional ethics, and maintain trust within the healthcare team. Reporting the incident and appropriately addressing the situation helps maintain the integrity of the profession and ensures the well-being of patients.
(Word count: 892)