1st page- Cover page 2nd page- Abstract (include what is the purpose of this project) 3rd page- Answering the following questions: Generally speaking, bioethics helps determine what is responsible by considering four key principles: , , , and . The principle of autonomy is about respecting people and their free will. Beneficence and nonmaleficence are two sides of the same coin: doing what is helpful, and not doing what is harmful. Justice, in this context, has to do with being fair in giving out both benefits and risks. Using your own words, answer the following questions: 1. How these models relate to one another varies with each circumstance 2. In your personal opinion which model may be the most important. Models: 1. Ethic of Care Model 2. Narrative Ethics Model 3. Complementary/Alternative Medicine (CAM) 4th page- References For full credit of 100 points, the following is expected: 1. Use APA format. 2. Utilize more than three references to answer the questions. 3. Your answers must be at least 2 paragraphs to each question.

Page 1: Cover Page

Page 2: Abstract

The purpose of this project is to explore the relationship between different ethical models and their application in the field of bioethics. Specifically, we will focus on the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, which form the foundation of bioethical decision-making. Additionally, we will examine three specific models: the Ethic of Care Model, the Narrative Ethics Model, and the Complementary/Alternative Medicine (CAM) Model. By understanding how these models relate to one another and their importance in different circumstances, we can gain insights into ethical decision-making in healthcare and beyond.

Page 3: Answering the Questions

Generally speaking, bioethics helps determine what is responsible by considering four key principles: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The principle of autonomy is about respecting people and their free will, allowing them to make informed decisions about their own healthcare and life choices. Beneficence and nonmaleficence are two sides of the same coin, emphasizing the importance of doing what is helpful and avoiding harm. Beneficence requires healthcare professionals to act in the best interest of their patients, while nonmaleficence focuses on avoiding actions that may cause harm or suffering. Lastly, justice in bioethics entails fair distribution of both benefits and risks, ensuring equitable access to healthcare resources and services.

When considering how these principles relate to one another, it is important to recognize that their application may vary depending on the specific circumstance. In some situations, autonomy may take precedence, allowing individuals to make decisions even if they may not align with what is considered beneficial or morally right. For example, respecting a patient’s decision to refuse life-saving treatment, even if it goes against what healthcare professionals believe is in their best interest, honors the principle of autonomy.

On the other hand, there may be situations where beneficence and nonmaleficence are prioritized over autonomy. For instance, when dealing with patients who lack decision-making capacity, healthcare professionals may need to act in accordance with their best interests, even if it means overriding their autonomy temporarily. This is particularly relevant in cases where patients are at risk of serious harm or when their decision-making capacity is compromised due to mental illness or cognitive impairment.

While autonomy and beneficence/nonmaleficence are essential principles in bioethics, the principle of justice also plays a vital role. Justice ensures fairness in the distribution of resources and opportunities, aiming to address disparities and promote equity. This principle guides healthcare professionals and policymakers in allocating healthcare resources, such as organs for transplantation or access to expensive treatments, in a way that is fair and just.

Moving on to the importance of different ethical models, it is challenging to determine which model is the most important as their significance may vary depending on the context and specific ethical dilemmas. However, each model brings unique perspectives and insights to bioethical decision-making.

The Ethic of Care Model emphasizes the importance of relationships and empathy in ethics. It recognizes the interconnectedness of individuals and the importance of considering the impact of decisions on others. This model highlights the need for caregivers and healthcare professionals to prioritize the well-being of their patients and emphasize their emotional and relational needs.

The Narrative Ethics Model focuses on the power of storytelling and personal experiences in ethical decision-making. It acknowledges the diversity of values and perspectives present in healthcare and encourages healthcare professionals to understand and respect the narratives of their patients, enabling a more holistic and patient-centered approach to care.

The Complementary/Alternative Medicine (CAM) Model challenges traditional biomedical approaches to healthcare and recognizes the value of integrative and holistic approaches to healing. This model emphasizes the importance of considering complementary therapies and treatments in conjunction with conventional medicine, promoting a comprehensive and patient-centered approach to healthcare.

In conclusion, bioethics encompasses the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, which guide ethical decision-making in healthcare. The Ethic of Care Model, the Narrative Ethics Model, and the Complementary/Alternative Medicine (CAM) Model provide different perspectives and insights into ethical decision-making, highlighting the importance of relationships, narratives, and integrative approaches. The significance and application of these models may vary depending on the specific circumstances and ethical dilemmas at hand.