As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. . In the chapter, “How Community-Based Organizations Are Addressing Nursing’s Role in Transforming Health Care,” the authors describe the community as the focus of advocacy action for change. They list a series of questions that help community teams develop organizing principles to guide their interventions, and the aim is to attack social determinants of health to make community change. Suppose a community team identifies lack of access to exercise modalities as a public health issue. If the team were to determine that pedestrian walkways need to be constructed, discuss at least two factors that would facilitate the development of the walkways and two that would hinder the development. For the hindrances, discuss ways that the team might work to overcome those hindrances. Continue to read daily from one of the policy briefs that are included in your weekly readings list. POLITICO Pulse is a daily briefing from POLITICO, and the Kaiser Health News Morning Briefing is a daily briefing from the Kaiser Family Foundation. Both focus on health care. Either one will keep you abreast of what is happening in health care policies and politics. In addition, subscribe to the “HealthCetera” podcast and listen to the podcast weekly. This is a production of WBAI, free speech radio of Pacifica Foundation Radio in New York City. Diana Mason and Barbara Glickstein are founders and codirectors of the Center for Health Media Policy (CHMP). Both are recognized as experts in media, nursing, health, and health policy. They have a longstanding relationship as producers and moderators of , a live, award-winning radio program on public radio and iTunes. They are bloggers for and for the . The CHMP is an interdisciplinary initiative for advancing the health of the public and healthy public policies through media, research, education, and public forums. Listen to the podcast throughout the course and think on the topics that are discussed, especially as they relate to how we advocate for issues of importance in this contemporary political environment.

The development of pedestrian walkways in a community can have significant benefits for public health, as it promotes physical activity and improves access to exercise modalities. However, there are several factors that can either facilitate or hinder the development of these walkways.

One factor that can facilitate the development of pedestrian walkways is community support. When the community recognizes the importance of having walkways and supports the initiative, it can create a favorable environment for the development of these infrastructures. Community support can be demonstrated through active engagement, participation in decision-making processes, and advocacy for the project.

Another factor that can facilitate the development of pedestrian walkways is political will. If local government officials and policymakers prioritize public health and recognize the value of walkways, they can allocate resources and implement policies to support their development. Political will can be influenced by the availability of evidence that demonstrates the benefits of walkways for public health and well-being.

On the other hand, there are also factors that can hinder the development of pedestrian walkways. One such factor is limited financial resources. Developing walkways requires significant investment in infrastructure and maintenance. If a community lacks the necessary funds, it can be challenging to secure financing for the project. Limited financial resources can be addressed through creative funding strategies, such as seeking grants, partnering with private developers, or securing government funding.

Another factor that can hinder the development of pedestrian walkways is opposition from vested interests. In some cases, there may be individuals or groups that are against the development of walkways due to concerns about property values, increased traffic, or other reasons. Overcoming this hindrance requires effective community engagement and communication to address concerns and misconceptions. It may also involve working with stakeholders to find compromises and solutions that satisfy the community’s needs while addressing the concerns of opposing parties.

To overcome hindrances in the development of pedestrian walkways, the community team can take several actions. First and foremost, they can employ a data-driven approach to demonstrate the need for walkways and their potential benefits for public health. This can involve collecting and presenting evidence on the impact of physical activity on health outcomes, the current state of physical activity levels in the community, and the potential reduction in healthcare costs associated with increased physical activity.

Additionally, the team can engage in strategic advocacy efforts to mobilize community support and raise awareness about the importance of walkways. This can involve organizing community meetings, conducting outreach campaigns, and partnering with local organizations and influencers to garner support for the project.

Furthermore, the team can explore alternative funding options, such as public-private partnerships or securing funds from external sources, to overcome financial constraints. They can also consider leveraging existing resources and infrastructure to minimize costs and maximize the impact of the project.

In conclusion, the development of pedestrian walkways as a solution to the lack of access to exercise modalities requires both facilitators and strategies to overcome hindrances. Community support and political will can facilitate the development of walkways, while limited financial resources and opposition from vested interests can hinder it. Overcoming these hindrances requires data-driven advocacy, community engagement, and creative funding strategies. By addressing these factors, communities can take meaningful action to promote public health and well-being through the creation of walkable environments.