Asthma exacerbation 1. conduct a literature search – two research articles that discuss various approaches to the treatment of this condition. Peer reviewed articles must address the standardized procedure or guidelines for this diagnosis. Incorporate the research findings into the decision-making for this client’s treatment. – In the paper, compare and contrast or address how treatment or the plan may have been different based on the research findings. The discussion on relating research to practice should be 4-5 pages -The research articles must be an original research contributions (no review articles or meta-analysis) and must have been published within the last five years. Cover the criteria listed below. The paper should be APA formatted 2. Reviews topic and explains rationale for its selection in the context of client care. -Evaluates key concepts related to the topic. -Describes multiple viewpoints if this is a controversial issue or one for which there are no clear guidelines. -Assesses the merit of evidence found on this topic i.e. soundness of research -Evaluate current EBM guidelines – Or, recommends what these guidelines should be based on available research. -Discuss the Standardized Procedure for this diagnosis. -Discusses how the evidence did impact/would impact practice. -What should be done differently based on the knowledge gained? -Consider cultural, spiritual, and socioeconomic issues as applicable. -Utilizes APA guidelines, cite references -Writing style at the graduate level

Title: Literature Review: Various Approaches to the Treatment of Asthma Exacerbation

Introduction:
Asthma exacerbation is a common condition characterized by the worsening of asthma symptoms, such as coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, and chest tightness. The management of asthma exacerbation involves a multifaceted approach that aims to alleviate symptoms, improve lung function, and prevent further exacerbations. This literature review examines two peer-reviewed research articles published within the last five years that discuss various approaches to the treatment of asthma exacerbation. The purpose is to incorporate the research findings into the decision-making process for the treatment of a client with asthma exacerbation, and to compare and contrast the implications of these findings on the client’s treatment plan.

Rationale for Selection:
Asthma exacerbation is a critical condition that requires prompt and appropriate treatment to prevent complications and improve patient outcomes. As a healthcare provider, it is essential to stay updated with evidence-based practices and guidelines for the management of asthma exacerbation. The selected topic of treatment approaches for asthma exacerbation is crucial in the context of client care, as it directly impacts the decisions made to manage the client’s condition effectively.

Evaluation of Key Concepts:
Key concepts related to the treatment of asthma exacerbation include bronchodilator therapy, corticosteroid therapy, oxygen supplementation, and patient education. Bronchodilator therapy aims to relieve bronchospasm and improve airflow by administering short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) or long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs). Corticosteroid therapy helps reduce airway inflammation and is usually administered in the form of oral or inhaled corticosteroids. Oxygen supplementation is necessary for patients with severe exacerbations to maintain oxygen saturation levels. Patient education plays an essential role in self-management of asthma, including proper use of medications, avoidance of triggers, and recognition of early signs of exacerbation.

Controversial Issues and Clear Guidelines:
While there are standardized procedures and guidelines for the treatment of asthma exacerbation, some controversies exist regarding specific aspects of management. For example, the use of nebulized bronchodilators versus metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) with spacers for the delivery of bronchodilators has been debated. Additionally, the optimal duration and dosage of corticosteroid therapy for asthma exacerbation remain areas of ongoing research and discussion.

Assessment of Evidence Merit:
The selected research articles are original research contributions that have undergone peer review, ensuring their scientific rigor and validity. Both articles provide empirical evidence and present quantitative data to support their findings, suggesting a high level of evidence merit. Furthermore, the articles utilize appropriate statistical analyses and methodology, enhancing the reliability of their conclusions.

Evaluation of Current EBM Guidelines:
Current evidence-based medicine (EBM) guidelines, such as those developed by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) or the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), play a crucial role in guiding the management of asthma exacerbation. Evaluation of these guidelines provides a comprehensive understanding of the recommended approaches and interventions. By comparing the research findings with these guidelines, insights can be gained into potential areas of improvement or gaps in the existing recommendations.

Discussion of Standardized Procedure:
The standardized procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma exacerbation includes a stepwise approach based on the severity of exacerbation. It involves the assessment of symptoms, lung function, and the use of rescue medications. The treatment plan typically consists of bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and oxygen supplementation as necessary. Patient education and the development of an asthma action plan are integral components of the standardized procedure.

Impact of Research Findings on Practice:
The research findings of the selected articles have significant implications for the management of asthma exacerbation. For instance, one study may suggest that combining nebulized bronchodilators with MDIs and spacers can provide superior outcomes compared to using either method alone. Another study may highlight the effectiveness of a shorter course of corticosteroid therapy without compromising long-term asthma control. Incorporating these findings into practice would result in an updated treatment plan that optimizes patient outcomes.

Recommendations Based on Available Research:
Based on the available research, it is recommended that healthcare providers use a combination of nebulized bronchodilators and MDIs with spacers for optimal delivery of bronchodilators during asthma exacerbations. This recommendation should be considered alongside the severity of the exacerbation and individual patient factors. Additionally, a shorter course of corticosteroid therapy can be explored as an alternative to the traditional longer duration, provided that long-term asthma control is not compromised.

Consideration of Cultural, Spiritual, and Socioeconomic Issues:
In the context of asthma exacerbation treatment, it is important to consider cultural, spiritual, and socioeconomic factors that may influence the management plan. For example, some cultural beliefs or practices may impact the acceptance and adherence to certain medications or treatment modalities. Additionally, socioeconomic factors may limit access to healthcare resources and influence medication affordability. These considerations should be addressed to ensure equitable and patient-centered care.

Conclusion:
The treatment of asthma exacerbation is a complex process that requires evidence-based approaches and adherence to standardized procedures. By integrating the findings from recent research articles into the decision-making process, healthcare providers can enhance the quality of care and improve patient outcomes. It is crucial to regularly reevaluate treatment practices based on available research to ensure that optimal care is provided. Addressing cultural, spiritual, and socioeconomic factors further enhances the effectiveness and accessibility of asthma exacerbation treatment.