The focus of this HCA-620: Business/Project Plan Evaluation and Development course are to begin integrating all previous study and to identify the focus of students’ final capstone project. During this course, students will learn how to evaluate and integrate the methodologies, considerations, and strategies for a project or program design, planning, implementation, and evaluation that are relevant or specifically required by their specific health care discipline.
Topics of investigation and consideration include (but are not limited to):
- Financial and economic impact;
- Resource allocation;
- Competition;
- Public and private educational requirements;
- Availability of information technology;
- Impact assessment of change;
- Process improvement assessment;
- Social, behavioral, and environmental impact;
- Legal/ethical issues; and
- Any other factors that impact the provision of care or subsequent outcomes within an organization and community.
A collaborative group project approach is emphasized to enhance contribution and consideration from diverse experiences within the health care field. With our HCA-620: Business/Project Plan Evaluation and Development assignment help, students get a chance to receive a well-written assignment that is guaranteed to score high marks.
Table of Contents
What is an evaluation plan?
An evaluation plan is an integral part of a grant proposal that offers information to improve a project during development and implementation.
The difference between an evaluation plan and research.
There are several differences between an evaluation plan and research, these include:
- Research generalizes whereas an evaluation particularizes,
- Evaluation is designed to improve something while research is designed to prove something.
- Research provides the basis for drawing conclusions while and evaluation provides a basis for decision making
- Research–how it works whereas an evaluation–how well it works
- Research is about what is while and evaluation is about what is valuable
7 types of evaluation models.
1. Formative evaluation.
Formative evaluation is used before program design or implementation. It helps to prevent waste and identify potential areas of concern while increasing the chances of success. It is used during the conceptualization phase of a project.
2. Process evaluation.
Process evaluation happens once program implementation has begun, and it measures how effective your program’s procedures are. It generates data that is useful in identifying inefficiencies and streamlining processes and portrays the program’s status to external parties. Process evaluation is meant to optimize the project, and measure its ability to meet targets, and suggest improvements for improving efficiency. Thus, it is used during the implementation phase of a project.
3. Outcome evaluation.
Outcome evaluation is predictably used during program implementation. The data it generates is on the program’s outcomes and to what degree those outcomes are attributable to the program itself. Therefore, it is used in measuring how effective your program has been and helps make it more effective in terms of delivering the intended benefits.
4. Economic evaluation.
This type of evaluation model is used during the program’s implementation and looks to measure the benefits of the programs against the costs. The data it generates helps to provide useful information to sponsors and backers who frequently want to see what benefits their money would bring to beneficiaries.
5. Impact evaluation.
Impact evaluation studies the entire program from beginning to end (or at whatever stage the program is at). Additionally, it looks to quantify whether or not it has been successful. This evaluation model type is used to measure sustained changes brought about by the program or to make policy changes or modifications to the program.
6. Summative evaluation.
Summative evaluation is conducted at the end of a program cycle/completion. The data generated is about how well the project delivered benefits to the target population. It is valuable to the program administrators to justify the project, show what they have achieved, and lobby for project continuation or expansion.
7. Goals-based evaluation.
Goals-based evaluation is usually done towards the end of the program or at previously agreed-upon intervals. This evaluation model is used in presenting reports to program administrators and backers, as it provides them the information that was agreed upon at the start of the program.
