HCA 255 describe the economic evaluation used to solve the school’s funding problems. How might this process be applied to solve a problem in health care?

After watching “One School’s Fight: The Making of a Law,” describe the economic evaluation used to solve the school’s funding problems. How might this process be applied to solve a problem in health care?

Answer:

One School’s Fight: The Making of a Law is a great story about how the economic evaluation process can be applied to solve major school funding problem. While this example deals with schools, this process can be used in many different situations.

Learn how a school in Brooklyn, New York, took on the bureaucracy of New York City’s education system and won. In doing so, they also put into motion a set of changes to educational funding that improved the quality of education for millions of American students. The economic evaluation used to solve the school’s funding problems was based on cost-benefit analysis, where costs can be measured in monetary terms, or hard cost, and benefits can be measured by increased student learning or performance outcomes such as test scores. This type of analysis is applicable in health care because there are many diseases and issues that need to be addressed that have externalities with both benefits and costs related to them. By applying this method we can have a more accurate picture of what exactly needs to be done to make progress in eliminating diseases/issues while maximizing productivity.

Did you know that the problem of funding schools is not just in poor and rural areas? One School’s Fight: The Making of a Law will discuss the problems that arose in a school district when students realized that their education was suffering. This video can help us realize how important our decisions are and how they can affect others.

One School’s Fight: The Making of a Law

Explore the featured article at the link below to read about how the school achieved funding reform. Use the “Evaluating Economic Justifications” section as a guide for how to apply the process for making decisions to solve problems in health care?

An economic evaluation is a quantitative method of making choices about how resources are allocated. One type of economic evaluation, cost-effectiveness analysis, can help you to make the best decision to improve health care. The video shows several people working together to find a solution for the children in their school district. An economic evaluation allows us to combine quantitative information/data with qualitative information/data to make decisions based on what will be most effective and efficient.

We are creating a video describing our own experience with the process of creating a law and we would like to know if you can provide some commentary on the economic analysis of the problem. We would like to know if this analysis can be used in any way to address problems in health care. If so, how? What was your experience with writing the bill? Could this help us create a similar bill for health care?

A school was running out of money so they wanted to know how much money it would cost to run the school. The people who were in charge did an economic evaluation and found that they needed a specific amount to run their school. After they found this number, they just raised the amount of taxes that they had to take.

Open Your Door to a New York Education With the help of economic evaluation, certain schools and their communities are able to provide a high standard of education for all children in the city.

The concept of cost-effective analysis is a useful one in all sorts of difficult problems. In order to solve their financial crisis, The Little Red School House had to show that they were spending as little per student as possible. They did this by getting information from their local government (these are the people who give out money). They also got data from their school district and made an audit of their own spending. They figured out the amount of money spent for each student and then compared it to other schools in their district. Now they had some basis for comparison and could find ways to cut costs or get more funding to make things work better.

In 1982, David Marans, a high-school student in California, is inspired to take action. He knows that classroom sizes are getting bigger, so he pens a letter to his congressman, Pete McCloskey. David worries that his school won’t have enough teachers if the class size gets any bigger—his science classes have already reached an unmanageable sixty students apiece. The congressperson responds with a promise to look into the problem, but nothing happens. So he reaches out to a different legislator, Joe Dunn from the neighboring Orange County district. And then another legislator, Warren Christopher from Santa Barbara.

In wealthy districts across the country, school administrators and parents are coming to terms with what happens when you get more money for your students, but not more money for your teachers. This has become an issue as federal and state governments have cut funding to schools in recent years — and as a recession has made it more difficult to get tax increases passed.

Question:

After watching “One School’s Fight: The Making of a Law,” describe the economic evaluation used to solve the school’s funding problems. How might this process be applied to solve a problem in health care?

Scroll to Top