Please, before you respond to the following prompts refer to the attached PowerPoint. This is based on the PowerPoint (Myra Levine) you did for me last week. Please respond to the following prompts: 1. Describe your thoughts on the grand theory about which your group presented. 2. What were the challenges that you faced in understanding the theory? 3. How did you attempt to resolve those challenges? – Your initial post should contain two to three (2–3) paragraphs of three to four (3–4) sentences per paragraph. – Integrate a minimum of three readings and/or other evidence-based research articles no more than three years old. – Use APA formatting for citations and references.
Answer
1. My thoughts on the grand theory presented by my group, which was based on the work of Myra Levine, are that it provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the holistic nature of human beings and their health. Levine’s Conservation Model emphasizes the interconnectedness of the individual and their environment, and how disruptions in this balance can impact their health. This theory emphasizes the importance of maintaining stability and equilibrium within the biological, psychological, and social aspects of an individual’s life.
The Conservation Model acknowledges the dynamic nature of human beings and recognizes that individuals are constantly adapting and conserving energy to maintain their health. It takes into account both internal and external factors that can affect an individual’s health status and proposes interventions aimed at restoring and promoting their well-being. The model also underscores the significance of nurses as advocates and facilitators of conservation, recognizing their role in promoting health and preventing illness.
2. Understanding the Conservation Model presented some challenges. One of the challenges was grasping the complex nature of the theory, as it incorporates multiple dimensions of health and their interplay with the environment. It required a comprehensive understanding of various disciplines such as biology, psychology, and sociology to fully appreciate the model’s underlying concepts. Additionally, the Conservation Model’s holistic approach also meant that I needed to consider multiple variables simultaneously, which sometimes made it difficult to identify the most pertinent factors contributing to an individual’s health status.
Another challenge was interpreting the model’s application in a practical setting. While the theory provided a conceptual framework for understanding health and illness, it required further exploration to identify specific interventions that could be implemented to promote conservation and restore balance. It was necessary to consider the unique needs and characteristics of individual patients and tailor interventions accordingly.
3. To resolve these challenges, I approached the study of the Conservation Model by engaging in a multi-disciplinary approach. I turned to a variety of readings and evidence-based research articles that spanned biology, psychology, and sociology to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the theory’s underlying principles. This allowed me to integrate different perspectives and develop a holistic view of the model. By analyzing multiple sources, I was able to identify the key concepts and variables in the model and explore their interrelationships.
In addition to reviewing literature, I also sought clarification from my group members by engaging in discussions and exchanging ideas. By collaborating with others who were studying the same theory, I was able to gain different perspectives and insights that contributed to my understanding of the Conservation Model. We shared our interpretations and debated the application of the theory in various clinical scenarios, enriching our understanding of its practical implications.
To further resolve the challenge of applying the model in a practical context, I sought out case studies and examples that illustrated its implementation in clinical settings. By examining real-world cases, I was able to identify the specific interventions that nurses can use to enhance conservation and promote health. This helped bridge the gap between theory and practice and allowed me to envision how the Conservation Model can be integrated into nursing care.
In conclusion, the grand theory presented by my group based on Myra Levine’s Conservation Model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the holistic nature of human beings and their health. While it posed challenges in terms of its complexity and practical application, these challenges were resolved through a multi-disciplinary approach, engaging with group members, and exploring real-world examples. By integrating various perspectives and understanding the underlying principles of the model, I developed a deeper understanding of the Conservation Model and its implications for nursing practice.
