Respond to this post with a positive response : Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research. Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives. Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library. Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research. Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings. Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence. Use  references Initial Post Upon reviewing this week’s lesson, it involves patient safety and how healthcare providers delivery it. The Institute of Medication (IOM) designed a model for patients which involved effectiveness, safety, patient-centered, timely, equitable, and efficiency(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, n.d.). One problem I have found is reporting near misses that were caught but could have resulted in errors while delivering patient care. Healthcare professionals are still afraid of corrective actions when reporting, including near misses. The article I found, showed how reporting improves patient safety and how to improve the delivery of care (Howell et al., 2015). As a nursing leader, I would encourage my staff to report near misses along with actual occurrences. I would explain that by reporting near misses it helps future patients by learning from the near misses. Patient safety should be an expected value, not something that hospitals deal with after something happens (Laureate Education, 2012i). At my work, we have safeguards that we can do anonymously. We can also fill out our name to report safety issues. As a nursing leader, I would meet with staff to remind them to choose the anonymous tab when reporting safeguards for patient safety if they were still concerned about corrective actions. I would explain that it is not about them getting in trouble but continuing improving safety to protect patients. Reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.). Model public report elements: A sampler. Retreived from Howell, A., Burns, E. M., Bouras, G., Donaldson, L., Athanasiou, T., & Darzi, A. (2015, December 9). Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data. Ebsco, 10(12), 1-15. Laureate Education (Producer). (2012i). Quality improvement and safety. Baltimore, MD: Author. Purchase the answer to view it

The issue raised in your post regarding reporting near misses in patient care is a crucial topic in ensuring patient safety. While it is commendable that you encourage your staff to report near misses, it is essential to address the concerns that healthcare professionals may have regarding corrective actions and potential repercussions.

Research suggests that creating a culture of safety, where reporting near misses is encouraged and valued, leads to improved patient safety outcomes (Howell et al., 2015). In a study analyzing patient safety incident reports, it was found that organizations that actively fostered a culture of reporting demonstrated higher safety levels (Howell et al., 2015). This highlights the importance of not only encouraging reporting but also addressing the fear and concerns of healthcare professionals.

To address these concerns, it may be helpful to implement a non-punitive approach towards reporting near misses. Research has shown that healthcare organizations that adopt a blame-free environment and prioritize learning from near misses are more effective in improving patient safety (Howell et al., 2015). By emphasizing that reporting near misses is not about punishment but about learning and preventing future errors, healthcare professionals may feel more comfortable reporting incidents.

Additionally, it may be beneficial to provide staff with anonymous reporting options, as you have already implemented in your workplace. Anonymity can alleviate concerns about potential reprisals and empower healthcare professionals to report near misses without fear of repercussions (Laureate Education, 2012). By utilizing a system where staff can choose to report anonymously or provide their name, you are promoting transparency and ensuring that safety concerns can be addressed without compromising the well-being of the reporting individual.

Creating a comprehensive patient safety reporting system should also involve regular feedback and communication. As a nursing leader, you can play a vital role in facilitating discussions with your staff about reported near misses and the resulting actions taken to improve patient safety. By engaging in open communication and addressing concerns, you can foster a sense of trust and encourage ongoing reporting.

Furthermore, it may be valuable to highlight the positive impact of near miss reporting on patient safety outcomes. Research shows that sharing lessons learned from near misses can lead to system-wide improvements in healthcare delivery (Howell et al., 2015). By actively involving your staff in discussions and educational sessions regarding the value of reporting near misses, you can demonstrate the benefits of their contributions to patient safety.

In conclusion, your approach of encouraging near miss reporting aligns with the goal of patient safety. To address the concerns of healthcare professionals, it is crucial to create a non-punitive environment that values reporting and fosters a culture of learning. By implementing anonymous reporting options, providing regular feedback, and highlighting the positive impact of reporting, you can support your staff in prioritizing patient safety and continuously improving the delivery of care.

Howell, A., Burns, E. M., Bouras, G., Donaldson, L., Athanasiou, T., & Darzi, A. (2015, December 9). Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data. Ebsco, 10(12), 1-15.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012i). Quality improvement and safety. Baltimore, MD: Author.