This week you will be working on assessment tools and diagnostic tests as well as health risk concerns. There are 2 assignments listed. You would assign either assignment option 1 or option 2. Some students to one of the diagnostics/tools and the other group of students a child case studies. Students also have their first SH assignment due during week 4. Make sure you all signed up. It is important to know that you will need to complete the concept exercise prior to completing you HH exercise. Please also you need to know that . This is located in the syllabus. We have scheduled Shadow Health sessions this week (announcement time coming soon). (3–4 pages, not including title and reference pages) Option 1Colonoscopy: Aderman, Bekele, Brinson, Chaqui, Dodoo & FritzRapid Strep Test in Adults: Gardot, Gonzalez, Hart, Ikwuegbu, Kim & Kouuznetsova Option 2: Namatovu, Obua, Ojevwe, Omeludike, Shomuyiwa, Tamou & Whipp2 year/old underweight female with underweight parents who are live with elderly grandparents

Title: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests for Health Risk Concerns

Assessment tools and diagnostic tests play a crucial role in identifying and evaluating health risk concerns in individuals. These tools provide healthcare professionals with valuable information that assists in making accurate diagnoses, determining appropriate interventions, and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment plans. This assignment focuses on two specific scenarios: Option 1 involves the use of a colonoscopy and a rapid strep test in adults, while Option 2 presents a case study of a 2-year-old underweight female with underweight parents living with elderly grandparents. This paper discusses the assessment tools and diagnostic tests utilized in each option, their relevance to the presented scenarios, and the potential health risk concerns associated with them.

Option 1: Colonoscopy and Rapid Strep Test in Adults
In Option 1, the group of students, consisting of Aderman, Bekele, Brinson, Chaqui, Dodoo, and Fritz, will explore the use of both a colonoscopy and a rapid strep test in adults. A colonoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that allows physicians to examine the inner lining of the colon and rectum. It is typically used for screening individuals for colorectal cancer, investigating symptoms such as rectal bleeding or abdominal pain, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for gastrointestinal conditions (American Cancer Society, 2021; Pabby et al., 2015).

The relevance of a colonoscopy in this scenario suggests that the selected patient may be experiencing gastrointestinal symptoms or may have risk factors for colorectal cancer. The utilization of this diagnostic test aims to identify any abnormalities or potential malignancies in the colon, allowing for early detection and timely intervention. The students must consider and address the specific risk concerns associated with the use of a colonoscopy, such as the potential for bowel perforation, bleeding, or adverse reactions to sedation (Sonnenberg et al., 2015; Pabby et al., 2015).

The rapid strep test, on the other hand, is commonly utilized to diagnose Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections in adults. The test involves obtaining a throat swab and utilizing a device to detect the presence of specific antigens produced by the bacteria. Rapid strep tests are quick and easy to perform, providing rapid results within minutes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021).

In this context, the students should consider the possibility that the presented patient may be showing symptoms of a streptococcal infection, such as sore throat, fever, and enlarged tonsils. The utilization of a rapid strep test aids in diagnosing the condition, enabling prompt initiation of appropriate treatment to prevent complications such as rheumatic fever or kidney inflammation (Durand et al., 2017). However, the students need to be aware of potential pitfalls associated with false-negative or false-positive results and be prepared to discuss the implications of both scenarios.

Option 2: Case Study of a 2-Year-Old Underweight Female
Option 2 is centered around a case study involving a 2-year-old underweight female with underweight parents, who live with elderly grandparents. This scenario presents a unique context that warrants a comprehensive assessment to identify potential health risk concerns and intervene appropriately. The group of students assigned to this option includes Namatovu, Obua, Ojevwe, Omeludike, Shomuyiwa, Tamou, and Whipp.

The underweight status of the child and her parents raises concerns regarding proper nutrition and potential underlying determinants of malnutrition. The students must employ various assessment tools, such as growth charts, dietary intake assessments, and biochemical tests, to evaluate the child’s nutritional status and identify any deficiencies or imbalances (Cole et al., 2017; Public Health Agency of Canada, 2020). Additionally, considering the presence of elderly grandparents in the household, the students should explore the potential impact of intergenerational nutrition and the influence of cultural and socioeconomic factors on the family’s dietary patterns and food security.

Assessment tools and diagnostic tests serve as valuable aids in identifying and evaluating health risk concerns. The selection options presented in this assignment require students to critically analyze the relevance of specific tools and tests in each scenario. Through these assignments, students can gain a deeper understanding of the importance of accurate assessment and early intervention in addressing potential health risk concerns. Careful consideration of the associated risks, proper interpretation of results, and comprehensive evaluation of the individual’s unique circumstances are crucial steps in ensuring effective and patient-centered care.